Control Resonant Metacritic Score

The number, with its date stamp

Aggregate scores move for weeks after launch as late reviews land. Ours was captured on September 18, 2026; the live figure on Metacritic is always the authoritative one.

Platform breakdown

The Xbox figure rests on the smallest sample by a wide margin, so the three-point gap to PS5 should not be read as a verdict on the Xbox build.

Score distribution

Metacritic’s breakdown is roughly 93% positive, 5% mixed and 2% negative. The average is built on broad approval rather than a pile of middling sevens.

What makes it unusual is the range inside that distribution: VGC gave a perfect 10/10 while ComicBook gave 4/10, criticising melee combat as hollow and repetitive. Both are counted in the 84.

How it compares in the series

Resonant beats the original release and sits just under the Ultimate Edition re-release. Coverage frames it as the best game in the series while noting it falls short of Alan Wake 2, the studio’s critical peak.

What an 84 does and does not tell you

It tells you the critical consensus is solidly positive and that the presentation — art direction, story, audio — is near-universally praised. It does not tell you whether the combat repetition that drove the low outliers will bother you personally.

In 2026 terms, 84 is a strong score that did not reach the year’s top 20. Treat it as a floor of quality rather than a promise of a personal favourite.

User score

At the time of writing, before launch, the Metacritic user score had not opened. User ratings only begin accumulating once the game is playable for the public, which for most people means September 24.

We do not publish a user score until one exists, and we will not estimate one from social sentiment.

Metacritic versus OpenCritic

The two aggregators agree almost exactly, which is itself informative. Metacritic’s 84 comes from 60 reviews; OpenCritic’s 84 Top Critic Average comes from 63 critics, with 84% recommending the game.

When two aggregators built on different weighting methods land on the same number, the figure is stable rather than an artefact of which outlets were counted.

Notable individual scores

Giant Bomb, Hardcore Gamer and Tom’s Guide all sit at 4.5/5, which is where the bulk of the distribution lives despite the visible outliers at both ends.

What drove the number up and down

Up: art direction, level design, story and cast performances, and audio work. These appear in the positive column of nearly every review, including several that scored the game below 80.

Down: repetitive combat encounters and optional activities, RPG systems described as basic, camera issues, and some cutscene direction judged generic by Remedy’s standards.

Using the score as a buying signal

An 84 with a 93% positive distribution is a reliable quality floor. What it cannot tell you is whether the specific weakness critics identified — repetition across a roughly 30-hour campaign — is one you personally notice.

Reading VGC’s 10/10 and ComicBook’s 4/10 side by side is a better use of ten minutes than staring at the aggregate, because they disagree about exactly one thing.

Where it sits against Remedy’s other work

Coverage consistently frames Resonant as the best game in the Control series while falling short of Alan Wake 2, the studio’s critical high point and the benchmark expectations were set against.

In 2026 terms, an 84 is a strong release that did not crack the year’s top 20. It is a good game by critical consensus rather than a consensus masterpiece.

What the score does not measure

Length, for one. The main story runs roughly 30 hours with completion nearer 50, and the repetition criticism that pulled some scores down is a direct function of that runtime.

Platform experience is another. Series S runs a single 30fps profile while PS5 Pro offers a ray-traced 40fps Balanced mode, and a single aggregate number flattens that difference entirely.

Checking the number yourself

• Metacritic shows the Metascore, the review count and the positive/mixed/negative split per platform.
• OpenCritic shows the Top Critic Average and the percentage of critics recommending.
• Both link the source reviews, so you can jump from the number to the reasoning behind it.

Any page quoting a score without a date — including this one, which is why ours carries September 18, 2026 — should be treated as a snapshot rather than a current reading.

The wide spread, in one line

VGC gave 10/10 and called the genre gamble a success; ComicBook gave 4/10 and called the melee combat hollow, relentlessly repetitive and poorly balanced. Both reviews are counted in the same 84.

That is the clearest argument against treating any aggregate as a personal recommendation — the number averages a disagreement rather than describing a shared experience.

Platform notes behind the scores

PS5 reviewers had access to Performance at 1440p/60 and Quality at 2160p/30, plus PS5 Pro modes adding ray tracing and PSSR. PC reviewers worked with a build Remedy tuned around upscaling at every spec tier.

Xbox’s 81 comes from ten reviews, the smallest sample by far, so the gap to PS5 says more about coverage volume than about the build.

Quick summary

• Metacritic: 84, Generally Favorable, 60 critic reviews.
• OpenCritic: 84 Top Critic Average, 84% of critics recommend, 63 reviews.
• Series comparison: Control 82, Control Ultimate Edition 85, Control Resonant 84.
• Distribution: roughly 93% positive, 5% mixed, 2% negative.

Sources

• Metacritic — CONTROL Resonant
• OpenCritic — Control Resonant
• The Gamer — Officially the best game in the series, but short of Alan Wake 2
• GamesRadar+ — Control Resonant Metacritic score in context

Related guides